55% of Hiring Managers Now Expect More Layoffs This Year — How To Read The May 2026 Survey

The Survey That Set The Tone For May 2026

A Resume.org survey of 1,000 U.S. hiring managers, circulating widely this week, gave the labor market its bluntest single number in months: 55 percent of managers expect their company to run additional layoffs before the end of 2026, and 44 percent identify AI as the top driver. The survey caught attention because it is a leading indicator, not a lagging one. Hiring managers know about cuts six to twelve weeks before they happen because they are typically asked to list candidates for the cut. When 55 percent of them say "yes, more is coming," that is roughly the share of large companies actively building 2026 reduction lists right now.

The instinct on reading a number like this is either fatalism (start panicking) or denial (it will not be me). Both are wrong responses for completely different reasons. The survey is informative, but the move it suggests is not the obvious one.

What The 55 Percent Number Actually Tells You

Hiring manager surveys are useful because they reflect committed intent, not sentiment. A manager saying "we expect more layoffs" is usually saying "I have been told to model my team at minus 10 to 20 percent for 2026 planning." The number does not mean every company in the survey is cutting. It means a majority of large employers are planning conservatively enough to expect another round.

The 44 percent AI number is more nuanced. It does not mean AI is doing the cut role\'s job in 44 percent of cases. It means hiring managers, when asked to name the top reason their executives gave for the cuts, listed AI most often. That is consistent with the broader pattern of 2026: the cuts are real, the cause attributed inside companies is "AI," and the actual mechanism is closer to capex reallocation funding AI infrastructure. Hiring managers report the cause executives gave them, which is downstream of how the cut was framed in the all-hands.

For your career planning, the practical reading of the survey is: assume your function will be reviewed for at least one more reduction this year, regardless of how individually well you are performing. If you are at a large public company, that is the new base rate. The question is what you do with the next six to ten weeks before your specific manager runs the list.

Why The Obvious Response Is The Wrong One

The instinct on reading 55 percent is to start applying widely and immediately. The math says do not. Job applications in May 2026 have a much lower hit rate than in 2024 because every other professional reading the same survey is doing the same thing. The same Resume.org survey reported applications per opening up roughly 2.7x year-over-year at large employers. Volume strategies are now low-yield.

What is actually high-yield in this market — and the data on time-to-offer in Q1 2026 supports this — is targeted, narrow, conviction-led searches. Eight to twelve target companies, picked because their capex profile is different from the announced cutters and their function-level hiring is actually moving. Inbound conversations with two or three former colleagues at each. A specific story for why you are a hire, not a generic resume.

The other high-yield play, when nothing in the market fits the timing, is the inverse: harden the seat. Stop hunting and instead make yourself the hardest cut in your function. That means visible cross-team work, public artifacts of your output, an explicit contribution to whatever AI program your company is running, and a quarter of overdelivering on the metric your manager will be asked to defend in the layoff meeting. This is unglamorous but it works.

The mistake is doing both half-heartedly: applying enough to feel like you are doing something, but not enough to actually generate offers, while also not visibly contributing enough at your current employer to be safe in the cut conversation. That is the worst quadrant in May 2026.

The Three Reads Of The Survey For Your Specific Seat

Three diagnostics map directly off the survey:

If you are at a company that has already announced 2026 reductions: the survey number for you is materially higher than 55 percent. Companies running cuts almost always run a second wave within nine months. Treat your seat as in a 70-80 percent reduction probability bracket through Q1 2027 unless leadership explicitly signals "this was the only round." Lead with the targeted external search.

If you are at a company that has not announced cuts but matches the profile of cutters — large, public, AI-capex-committed: 55 percent is the right base rate. Run the harden-the-seat play first, with a parallel quiet network conversation track. Do not start a full-volume external search yet; wait for a clearer signal.

If you are at a profitable mid-cap, services firm, or vertical specialist not running an AI capex squeeze: the 55 percent number is a market frame, not a direct read on your seat. Your bigger 2026 risk is probably stagnant comp, not a cut. Focus on negotiation leverage, not survival.

What The Survey Does Not Capture

Hiring manager surveys are good at intent and bad at variance. The survey reports an aggregate. Your seat\'s actual risk is a function of three things the survey does not measure: how compressible your specific function is in a CFO\'s opex review, how visible your individual output has been over the last two quarters, and how strong your external network is right now. Those three variables, multiplied together, are what determine whether the 55 percent applies to you or whether the actual probability for your seat is closer to 20 or to 80.

The Ikimate assessment scores the three variables individually. It does not give you a single "layoff risk" number because that number is misleading at the individual level. It gives you the three components and a recommended sequence of moves keyed to your specific combination. That is more useful than a percentage, because the move set differs sharply across combinations.

The Bottom Line On May 5, 2026

The 55 percent figure from the Resume.org survey is a real signal that the 2026 cut cycle is not done. The 44 percent AI attribution is real but partly a framing effect — the underlying mechanism is capex reallocation, and the executive narrative is "AI." For your career, the survey changes the base rate, not the move. The move depends on your specific seat: targeted external search if your employer has already cut, harden-the-seat if it matches the cutter profile but has not announced, negotiate from strength if your employer is on the other side of the capex equation. The worst response is the in-between one — splitting effort across both plays without committing to either.

Take the Assessment Now →

Key Takeaways

• A May 2026 Resume.org survey of 1,000 hiring managers reports 55 percent expect additional layoffs at their company before year-end and 44 percent name AI as the top stated driver.
• Hiring manager surveys are leading, not lagging — the 55 percent reflects managers who have been asked to model their teams at minus 10-20 percent for 2026 planning, six to twelve weeks before the cuts are announced.
• The 44 percent AI attribution reflects what executives told managers, not necessarily the underlying mechanism — at large public companies the operative cause is capex reallocation funding AI infrastructure.
• The right response depends on your seat: targeted 8-12 company external search if your employer already cut in 2026, harden-the-seat if it matches the cutter profile but has not announced, negotiation leverage if you are at a non-capex-squeezed employer.
• The worst response is splitting effort across volume applications and visible work without committing to either; in May 2026 that quadrant produces neither offers nor safety.